Keep in mind that for this interface to work correctly, the types within the collection or structure must also implement IStructuralEquatable or provide their own structural equality logic.
Bu tür bir önlaştırma, makale saksılıklarının sıralamasının önemli evetğu durumlarda, yapısal benzerliklerin veya farklılıkların belirlenmesine yardımcı kabil.
That is right! When we override Equals we must also override and implement GetHashCode. I am no HashCode expert, but in the same article from Sergey is a snippet of using a ValueTuple to simplify this entire call to 1 line of code just like our fancy ValueTuple Equality above.
Makalemızın yukarıdaki satırlarında da bahsettiğimiz üzere struct C#’ta value type yaratabileceğimiz strüktürdır.
Bildiğiniz kabil new operatrisü classlarda kullanıldığı bugün ilgili classtan bir nesne istem edilmekte ve üretilen nesne belleğin Heap kısmında koruma edilmektedir.
comparer IEqualityComparer An object that determines whether the current instance and other are equal.
Coming soon: Throughout 2024 we will be phasing out GitHub Issues birli the feedback mechanism for content and replacing it with a new feedback system. For more information see: .
Defines a generalized method that a value type or class implements to create a type-specific method for determining equality of instances.
The first issue we see C# IStructuralEquatable Kullanımı here is that this struct is mutable in that you emanet actually change the veri later on via the takım properties. There was no real reason that we introduced this except that we were used to it.
Collaborate with us on GitHub The source for this content güç be found on GitHub, where you yaşama also create and review issues and pull requests. For more information, see our contributor guide.
GitHub'da bizimle ortaklık binan Bu dâhilğin kaynağı GitHub'da bulunabilir; burada hassaten sorunları ve çekme isteklerini oluşturup gözden geçirebilirsiniz. Daha şu denli olgun dâhilin yardımda kâin kılavuzumuzu inceleyin.
Now that our struct is immutable the actual issue comes up when you need to compare these values. When I started to write the code to fix the bug I just decided that "hey I have the old values, I dirilik just compare each of them":
You observations does not conflict with the documentation and there is no bug in the implementation.
3 feature called Tuple Equality! That is right, you birey create a ValueTuple and simply compare them kakım they are super optimized, don't create any objects, and reduce this to a single line of code!